mardi 14 février 2012

Does the Egyptian revolution equal a revolution of the press?



Mubarak of course has been known to Egyptian journalists as the president of Egypt for the last thirty years. However, the word Mubarak also signified to most journalists a red line, a limit that shall not be crossed. Criticizing Mubarak openly and attacking the way he ruled the country were not an option for the majority of Egyptian journalists.  Even though freedom of speech might have not been as curtailed as it is in most of the Gulf countries nowadays, the name Mubarak certainly was not one to be dragged into the mud.
Today, we live in a time where everything seems possible: dictators were brought down by the people; the military leaders of Myanmar seem to be warming up towards the idea of granting their citizens more rights, after the death of Kim Jung Il even North Korea might get a chance to reconsider its past and start with a clean slate.
However, no need to get too excited too soon. In a time where everything seems possible, freedom of the press should be one of the easiest things to attain.  That much established, can we possibly talk about a revolution that has taken place in the Egyptian media sphere over the last 12 months, or did the revolution stop dead in its tracks before entering Egypt’s printing and publishing houses?
Once we get a closer look at the state of freedom of the press in Egypt, the picture we get has a quite sobering effect on our previously exhilarated minds. One thing becomes clear, with Mubarak gone, the red line of today’s news reporting has become the ruling military council, known under the name of SCAF.
Only a few days ago, the prominent talk-show host Reem Maged as well as her guest Hossam el- Hamalawy, known to be a n activist and journalist, had to appear in front of the SCAF who accused them of portraying lies about the military council. Maged and Hamalawy had expressed concern that the SCAF who tries to portray itself as going hand in hand with the people and protecting the revolution for their own good, had actually physically attacked protestors.
On top of that, not only local journalists and activists fall victim to the SCAF, only last Saturday, the Australian journalists Austin Mackell along with his Egytian translator Aliya Alwi were arrested by the military while covering a general strike in the city of Mahalla.
Joseph Mayton on bikyamasr.com commented the case of Mackell and Alwi in the following: “Now, my colleagues are being taken to a military prosecutor and could face an illegal military trial for doing their job. For attempting to show the world the truth. This is the face of SCAF. They have lost all credibility and their stalwart attempts to paint foreigners, and especially journalists, as the enemy of the revolution, must come to an end. […] Without their removal from power, journalism is dead; the revolution is dead.”
If one were to argue that this article so far has been solely based on observations and subjective experiences, here is a number that should make Egyptians as well as the rest of the world worry: According to the latest Press Freedom Index issued by Reporters Without Borders, Egypt has since the beginning of the revolution fallen 39 places and now lands on rank number 166, on par with countries like Cuba.
It is time that Egypt again protects the right by its citizens and most of all journalists to seek the truth, to question and of course, to disagree.  It is time for a revolution of the press.

dimanche 12 février 2012

What is the role of social media in the Arab revolutions?

With people arguing that the revolutions in the Middle East can be called social media revolutions, one sometimes asks oneself whether or not those people are aware of the fact that they not only show of their ignorance and lack of understanding but also a huge disrespect to what is happening in the Middle East right now. A different way of looking at the role of social media in the upheavals/civil wars/revolutions that we are witnessing is offered by the prominent twitter personality of Sultan al-Qassemi, who stated that social media helped make the uprisings "more efficiently". Check out the article about al-Qassemi and his personal contribution to the Egyptian revolution over twitter on :

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/richard-adams-blog/2011/jul/08/sultan-al-qassemi-twitter

Writing history through tweets?

How do we write history? What sources do we use, and will those sources change over time? Does social media have the credibility and quality to become a respectable source for writing history? Those are questions we should ask ourselves, especially after we see it done already by aljazeera english, which undertook the task of writing a short history of the Egyptian revolution by using twitter feets.
check it out under: Tweets from Tahrir!

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/spotlight/tweetsfromtahrir/